Skip to content
Search
AI Powered
Latest Stories

Bid for new c-store in Rotherham village rejected for third time

convenience store in Rotherham village
(Photo via LDRS)

Amended plans for a new convenience store in Thorpe Hesley have been refused on the grounds of “unacceptable levels of noise nuisance and general disturbance”.

The shop was proposed on land off Brook Hill, which was used as a manège and sand paddock for equestrian purposes – but received 81 objections from residents.


Previous plans were refused by RMBC in July 2021, for reasons relating to design, specifically on the character and appearance of the area and adjacent Thorpe Helsey Conservation Area; perceived noise disturbance and access and parking provision.

A second application was refused in February 2022.

Residents objected on the grounds of an increase in traffic and parking; narrow roads which “cannot cope with large HGV delivery lorries”; flood risk; and impact on wildlife and ecology.

Four letters were in support of the scheme.

Proposals included a split level shop opening seven days a week, with a sales floor at ground level and back of house at basement level, as well as 11 parking spaces.

“The appearance is one of a residential scale that will assimilate well within the urban grain and make a positive contribution to the street scene and adjacent Conservation Area,” adds the report.

To combat concerns around noise and general disturbance, the applicant submitted a noise assessment and management plan.

However, the proposal was refused on the grounds of “unacceptable levels of noise nuisance and general disturbance”.

An officer report added: “The proposed development in this prominent location within the village would have a poor relationship with neighbouring properties and be at odds with the character of the surrounding area in general.”

“The proposed scheme would not provide a safe and suitable access for all users.

“The Council considers that the proposed food store would be in conflict with the predominantly residential surroundings by introducing a use which would lead to unacceptable levels of noise nuisance and general disturbance to local residents.

“It would also have an adverse effect on the setting of the adjacent Thorpe Hesley Conservation Area.”