Shareholders in food and drink giants such as PepsiCo, Coca-Cola and Mondelez are among a group of investors calling on the sector to be more transparent about the healthiness of its sales as a first step towards taking accountability for its significant impact on public health, in a move coordinated by responsible investment NGO ShareAction, the NGO stated.
The investors include Legal & General Investment Management, Pictet Asset Management, Nest, and CCLA, who collectively manage £2.34trn in assets. In a letter delivered today (21) to the chief executives of PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, Mondelēz, Kraft Heinz, Kellanova, and General Mills, investors have called on the companies to follow the likes of Unilever and Danone in adopting internationally-accepted nutrition standards for publicly reporting the healthiness of their sales.
The investors have raised concerns that an over-reliance on sales of less healthy products leads to poor diets and sicker societies, which they claim harms economic productivity and threatens long-term business success and financial returns. The investors added that a lack of transparency hinders their ability to fully assess risks and opportunities.
“We believe that health is a systemic risk that affects the whole economy,” said Tom Sanders, Senior ESG Analyst at Nest. “The increased consumption of unhealthy products harms public health and could reduce worker productivity, creating externalities that can impact our long-term investment returns as a globally diversified investor. Food and drink companies must take responsibility in helping manage these risks by being more transparent, using internationally recognised nutrition standards as an important first step.”
The move comes amid an increasing focus by governments and consumers on the food and drink sector’s reliance on sales of foods that are high in fat, salt and sugar. Around one in eight people globally are living with obesity, including millions of children, which is projected to cost the global economy more than £3.34trn a year by 2035.
Thomas Abrams, Co-Head of Health at ShareAction, said: “It’s really encouraging to see the momentum building among the investment community to hold the food and drink sector to account for its impact on public health. By adopting a responsible investment approach to public health investors can not only manage financial risks but also help more people to enjoy healthier lives for longer.”
ShareAction and the investors are asking the food and drink companies to commit to adopting one or more of the internationally accepted Nutrient Profiling Models used to define healthy food, rather than their own in-house versions.
Local councils across the UK have been handed new powers to tackle the scourge of empty shops as High Street Rental Auctions (HSRAs) took effect on Monday (2 December).
Local authorities will be able to auction off leases for commercial properties that have been empty for long periods, with the HSRAs creating a ‘right to rent’ for businesses and community groups, giving them access to city, town and village centre sites.
The changes will stop disengaged landlords sitting on empty lots for more than 365 days in a 24-month period, before councils can auction a one-to-five year lease.
The government has committed over £1m in funding to support the auction process, which is expected to create jobs for local people and boost trade by bringing local businesses back to the heart of the communities.
“Small businesses need our support and that’s why we are creating a ‘right to rent’ so that high street lots that have been left empty for far too long can be brought back to life,” local growth minister Alex Norris said.
“We want shops and shoppers back on the high street – and that’s what these changes will help to bring.”
Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds added: “Empty shop premises that gather dust aren’t doing any good to high streets, jobs and the economy. This is why we said we’d lift the shutters, and today we are delivering on that promise.
“Paired with the wider small business strategy to tackle late payments, getting more SMEs exporting, and boosting access to finance, we are unashamedly backing small firms, to get more people into well paid jobs and help grow our economy.”
The government has announced that four local authorities will lead the way as Early Adopters of the new high streets powers. Bassetlaw, Darlington and Mansfield councils will set an example for other local authorities across England, while Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council will join the Early Adopters programme in an advisory role as critical friends.
Additional local authorities have been invited to join the programme at a later stage.
Originally introduced by the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023, the High Street Rental Auctions powers came into force after legislation was laid in November. Before putting a property to a rental auction, a local authority must first seek to resolve the vacancy by engaging with the landlord.
The changes come ahead of Small Business Saturday this week, and the business secretary kicked off a week of activity ahead of the event by visiting several small businesses in and around Walthamstow High Street in North-East London.
The government will convene the first meeting of the Retail Crime Forum today (3 December), bringing together senior law enforcement officials, retail trade associations, and major retailers to tackle crime on high streets and improve safety for retail workers.
The meeting follows the government’s commitment to introduce a new specific offence of assaulting a retail worker, ending the effective immunity that currently applies for theft of goods under £200 and increased funding of £7 million over three years to policing will help tackle retail crime.
The forum is part of a broader package of measures unveiled today aimed at bolstering small businesses across the UK, in anticipation of Small Business Saturday this weekend.
One of the headline announcements is the launch of the Fair Payment Code, designed to combat late payments that cost SMEs an average of £22,000 a year. Overseen by Small Business Commissioner Liz Barclay, the code introduces a tiered system—gold, silver, and bronze—recognising businesses with exemplary payment practices. This initiative aims to improve cash flow for small firms, reducing financial strain and increasing survival rates.
“The Fair Payment Code is our response to all those suppliers who begged for a more aspirational, robust and ambitious approach to changing the business to business payment culture in the UK. It also gives a clear signal of intent on the part of Government,” Barclay commented.
The government has also teamed up with leading banks, including Barclays, HSBC UK, Lloyds Banking Group, and NatWest, to launch the Disability Finance Code for Entrepreneurship. This initiative will improve access to finance and mentoring for disabled entrepreneurs, recognising the potential to unlock an additional £230 billion in economic growth, as highlighted by the Lilac Review.
“The banking and finance industry understands the importance of supporting entrepreneurs with disabilities and improving access to finance for all,” said David Raw, managing director of Commercial Finance at UK Finance.
“Many lenders already have commitments and activities in place to support customers with disabilities and will continue to develop and enhance these to support customer needs.”
In another move to empower entrepreneurs, a partnership between Female Founder Finance and UK Export Finance will provide free services to help female-led businesses access funding and expand their networks. This initiative aims to tap into the potential of women entrepreneurs and ensure they have the tools to scale their ventures successfully.
The announcements come as the prime minister is hosting a reception at Downing Street for small business leaders and small business representative organisations from across the UK.
“This government’s primary ambition is clear: to go for growth. To do that, we must unleash the potential of our entrepreneurs,” small business minister Gareth Thomas said.
“These measures will help remove barriers that are holding our small businesses back and ensure everyone has the backing they need to succeed.”
Britain's Supreme has bought out loss-making tea brand Typhoo Tea from administration in a 10.2 million pound deal, the fast-moving consumer products seller said on Monday (2).
The 120-year-old tea brand had fallen into administration in November due to declining sales and mounting debt pressures. A break-in at its Merseyside factory in August 2023 exacerbated the company's cost pressures, and the site was subsequently shuttered.
Typhoo generated revenues of about £20m for the year to 30 September, with a pre-tax loss of about £4.6m. The new owner said it plans to run Typhoo on a “capital-light, outsourced manufacturing model” in a bid to improve profits.
As stated by the FMCG giant, Supreme plans to turn Typhoo’s fortunes around by leveraging its efficient supply network to keep products flowing into stores, thereby reducing some of the costs which were dragging Typhoo down, and giving it a new lease of life.
The company’s decision to purchase Typhoo is a mix of sound business rationale and personal affinity.
Sandy Chadha, Supreme CEO, said, “I grew up with Typhoo. Drinking it and watching the ‘you only get an OO with Typhoo’ ads with Su Pollard from Hi-di-Hi. That was my era. Typhoo is such an iconic brand, and with Supreme’s distribution network and resources, we have the scope to grow and develop it.
“The acquisition of Typhoo Tea Ltd marks a significant step in our broader diversification strategy and brings one of the most iconic UK consumer brands into the Supreme family. I believe Typhoo will thrive under our ownership, further benefitting from Supreme’s significant market reach and successful track record in creating brand loyalty, making us an ideal fit for this business.
“We are very excited about these latest additions to our portfolio, which mean we can serve our existing customers even better and get acquainted with many new ones.”
Supreme PLC is a Manchester-based company that manufactures and supplies a variety of everyday items to supermarkets, specialist retailers and direct to consumers. These include Duracell and Energizer batteries, SCI-MX (sports nutrition), Sealions (nutritional supplements), Perfectly Clear drinks, and Black & Decker lighting. Supreme also supplies several brands of vapes, including its own-manufactured 88Vape.
The latest move is said to be part of a strategy by Supreme to expand its operations away from vaping, after buying the soft drinks business Clearly Drinks earlier this year, before a planned government crackdown on disposable vapes.
Keep ReadingShow less
Single-use disposable vapes are displayed for sale on October 27, 2024 in London, England
ast month, the government confirmed that disposable vapes will be banned across England and Wales from June 1, 2025.
Single use vapes were also due to be banned in Scotland from April of next year but shortly after the UK government’s announcement, the Scottish government advised that this date would be pushed back by two months – to June of next year – to align with the legislation in the rest of the UK. Northern Ireland is also expected to follow suit.
Announcing the ban – which will not apply to rechargeable or refillable devices – circular economy minister Mary Creagh said that it was to end the nation’s “throwaway culture” and marked the first step on the road to a circular economy, where resources are used for longer, waste is reduced and the path to net zero is accelerated.
Now this key date is known, the Fed will work with the respective governments and with vape suppliers to ensure that members are prepared for next summer’s ban coming into force and to ensure they have sold through their existing stock ahead of June 1.
But we can’t help thinking that rather than banning single use vapes in a bid to reduce littering, that the governments have missed a trick.
Mo Razzaq
Fed members are responsible retailers. We care about our communities and we accept that discarded disposable vapes do damage the environment.
In fact, according to the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), almost five million single use vapes were either littered or thrown into general waste each week last year – a nearly four-fold increase on the year before. Typically ending up in landfill, their batteries can leak battery acid, lithium and mercury into the environment, the government said.
And yes, this is truly shocking – but here at the Fed we believe there is still a better solution to an outright ban, and it is one that we have pitched to ministers on several occasions.
A disposal scheme, similar to that due to come into force in October 2027 on single use drink cans, and with a £1 deposit on all single use vapes which is paid back when they are returned, would help resolve the littering issue overnight. The price change and the returns system might also push people towards using refillable vapes instead.
Many retailers already offer a recycling option, so rather than just banning disposable vapes, the governments should be looking at making available more ways for these products to be disposed of safely and in an environmentally friendly way.
Introducing a disposal scheme on disposable vapes, we believe, would better address the government’s concerns on the environmental impact that they currently have.
Retailer Eric McGill showcases vape recycle bin in his store
As well as tackling environmental damage, the ban is designed to end the surge in young people vaping, but – again – the Fed and our members have serious concerns about it. In short, it will simply fuel the illicit market even further.
Disposable vapes are usually more affordable, which is why many adults turn to them when they want to quit smoking. Ban them and it is highly likely that many vapers will turn to unorthodox and illicit sources where there is no compliance to tobacco and vaping laws and a danger to health, as the products being peddled are likely to contain dangerous and illegal levels of toxic chemicals.
What is particularly concerning is the kind of groups who will benefit from this. Gangs who smuggle do not just transport illicit cigarettes and vapes. Many of them are also involved in some of the most dangerous and darkest elements of the black market, with the profits used to fund the smuggling of weapons, drugs – and even people.
Many children and teenagers are already obtaining vapes from unorthodox sources including cafes, take-away shops, hair salons, car boot sales and tanning salons. That’s in addition to deliveries by dealers to the home or on street corners just 30 metres from the school gate.
What’s more frightening is that these rogue sales will take place regardless of the buyer’s age. The peddlers couldn’t care less whether the customer is 18 or over. They just want the profit.
Just like shoplifting, selling counterfeit and non-duty tobacco and vapes is not a victimless crime. It damages legitimate retail businesses and communities, as well as robbing the government’s coffers of billions of pounds.
Since the date of the ban was confirmed, we have written to Mary Creagh to set out our concerns and to offer to meet so we can discuss ways of expanding schemes that enable disposable vapes to be recycled and to better educate the public on these.
And Asian Trader readers can play a part in helping to stub out illicit sales.
I’d ask that you report any suspicions about illegal vape and tobacco sales to the authorities.
This can be done by calling Trading Standards through the Citizens Advice consumer hotline on 0808 223 1133; HMRC’s Fraud Hotline on 0800 788 887; or Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111 Alternatively, you can report suspicions via https://suspectit-report-it.co.uk/; or by emailing suspectit.reportit@ uk.imptob.com.
Concerns should also be raised with your local MP. Council and police and crime commissioners.
As Tobacco and Vapes Bill makes its way into parliament with promises of a healthier smokefree UK, convenience retailers across the country are anxious, fearing an impending storm of challenges on the horizon, finds Asian Trader.
Ignoring the outcry from small business owners and consumer freedom advocates alike, Labour introduced the Tobacco and Vapes Bill in the parliament on Nov 5.
Reviving the bill from previous Conservative government, Labour has made the legislation even more stifling with a couple of additional measures, such as looking into extending smoke-free places and introducing a licensing scheme for tobacco and vape retailers.
The core of the bill is a ban on selling "tobacco products, herbal smoking products, and cigarette papers to anyone born on or after January 1, 2009”.
Notably, the focus is on selling here, thereby placing the entire burden of enforcement on retailers with no repercussions on the “under-age adult” asking or rather coercing for a cig.
Touted as a world-leading idea, the bill's intentions are noble, but in practice, it is expected to impose severe operational challenges for store owners.
Like in 2040, it will be still legal to sell cigarettes to 32-year-olds but a retailer will face a criminal offence for selling the same to 30-year-olds, probably facing the customer wrath too on being denied the sale.
According to the proposals, after Jan 1, 2027, each cigarette or tobacco product sale will come with the mandatory checking of a government-approved ID (namely passport, UK driving licence, a driving licence issued by any of the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man, European Union photo card driving licence, or an identity card issued by the Proof of Age Standards Scheme and bearing its hologram) to make sure the buyer is “born after 2009”.
Asian Trader reached out to some of the leading convenience retailers across the UK, and the air was thick with frustration and despair, majorly over the fact that the government is pressing ahead with the bill, ignoring their pleas.
Highlighting the bill’s daunting implications, retailer Neil Godhania, who owns and runs Neil’s Premier in Peterborough, heavily criticised the move, saying that such a law, if it comes into effect, will put a multi-level burden on retailers.
He said, “The ban requires that stores verify each customer’s birth year to ensure they’re not part of the restricted generation, adding an extra layer of complexity to existing age verification.”
This increased scrutiny will demand rigorous staff training, higher operational costs, and a heightened risk of penalties—all of which erode the quality of customer service and increase stress on staff, he explained.
Not only are these restrictions impractical, but they also risk exacerbating an already tense retail environment.
According to ACS 2024 Crime Report, most (87 per cent) colleagues in convenience stores have faced verbal abuse over the last year while enforcing the law on age restricted sales has been named among the top three triggers for abuse.
With customer abuse cases at record high levels, Godhania fears that the bill’s requirements will only escalate confrontations.
Elsewhere in Croydon, Nisa retailer Benedict Selvaratnam (also known as Ben) is having similar concerns about this new added layer of complexity. Sharing Godhania’s concern, Ben also fears both customers’ backlash as well as delay in service at the till.
Ben said, "The added layer of complexity will slow down transactions at the point of sale, leading to potential delays, especially in busy stores like ours where every minute counts."
Retailers like Bobby Singh, who manages BB Nevison Superstore and Post Office in Pontefract, fears that these measures will force them into adversarial roles with customers.
Sharing his apprehensions, Singh told Asian Trader, “Through such laws, the government is basically expecting us to question grown adults on their choices.
"We will be questioning grown up responsible adults on their freedom of choice and this is just going to cause confrontation for me and my teams.”
Retailer Bobby Singh
Across borders in Wales, independent retailer Trudy Davies, who runs Woosnam and Davies News in Llanidloes, is worried about what she is going to do if this bill becomes law. She shares her apprehension over the strain the law would impose on her already overburdened staff.
Davies told Asian Trader, "When adult customers are asked for id - it then becomes a ‘flashpoint’ for disruptive purchasers whom the store staff will have to deal with. Their anxiety levels and stress with just daily things they deal with is enough for them.
"Now with more and more put onto them, particularly ‘policing’ as part of their job, it will be more worrisome for us business owners.
"Moreover, it is unimaginable how each cigarette or basic tobacco product will require an ID check every single time, putting other customers behind in line waiting to be served.”
Boost to illegal tobacco
Such age-restrictive ban might be a challenge for law-abiding stores though the move seems a blessing for illegal traders.
As perfectly summed by Davies, traders of illicit and contraband tobacco products are now eagerly looking forward to the ban coming in, “rubbing their hands together as we speak”.
A look at a recent research carried out by the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association shows that most (80 per cent) UK smokers have bought illicit tobacco in the past year while the number of smokers that had bought illicit tobacco increased 6 per cent on the previous year.
Clearly, buying a fake or a contraband cigarette is neither unfamiliar nor new for smokers.
With weak penalties for perpetrators, poor border controls, low arrest rates and tobacco taxes creating disparity between neighbouring countries, it’s a problem that’s only set to grow. And the proposed ban is only expected to add wings to it.
Singh said, “The UK will see a boom in illicit trade, if such a ban comes into effect. We all know that illicit traders do not care about compliance or any kind of responsibility. Such a ban is only going to make things harder for convenience stores.
"People are anyway going to consume cigarettes if they want to, and they will get them from illicit sources.”
Sharing the concern that the ban will unintentionally fuel the already significant illegal tobacco market, Ben told Asian Trader, "Restricted legal access may drive younger generations to seek illicit sources, impacting legitimate retailers like us who are already affected by illegal trade competition.
"This situation could exacerbate the problem of counterfeit and untaxed tobacco flooding the market, posing further risks for community health and retail safety."
The knock-on effects don’t stop there.
Retailer Priyesh Vekaria, a One Stop retailer in Manchester, highlighted the risk that illegal trade funds organized crime, "The key concerns for me are that illicit trade and grey markets will boom.
“The bigger concern is that often illicit trade and grey markets are linked to and fund organised crime and this could pose much more serious implications to communities, if this is not carefully and practically enforced."
Dear Government
It is clear that implementation of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, if it comes into effect, will require retailers to make significant changes in their businesses.
At this critical juncture, the government is being called on to support convenience retailers in implementing any proposed changes.
Retail bodies like the Association of Convenience Stores (ACS) are urging for clear guidance and public awareness efforts to ease the transition.
They are also stressing that the onus should be on policymakers to equip retailers with resources rather than leaving them to bear the brunt of implementation alone.
As Vekaria explains, “Advocating health in the community is key to being a responsible retailer.
"The government needs to own their decisions and support implementation with due diligence and consideration for the businesses who are facing customers at the grass root level.
Retailer Priyesh Vekaria
“Support us and work with us, understand our concerns to help us to implement your legislative changes,” he added.
Vekaria’s call for support is echoed by other retailers too, both for support and killing illegal trade.
Ben said, "I would urge the government to consider support measures for retailers as they roll out this ban. This could include investment in training, technology, and clear guidelines.
“Additionally, the government should prioritise combating the illegal tobacco trade with stricter enforcement and increased resources. Without tackling the illegal market, the impact of this ban might undermine its intended health benefits."
Furthermore, the bill will also include powers to introduce a licensing scheme for retailers to sell tobacco, vape and nicotine products in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
ACS chief James Lowman warned that this scheme, introduced without prior consultation, risks pushing legitimate businesses out simply based on location, impacting investment and growth in the sector.
“We now need proper discussion of the details as regulations are drafted, or we fear that this legislation will significantly impact investment, growth and service provision in our sector,” he said.
Unnecessary, impractical, delusional
In 2011, 20 per cent of UK adults smoked, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) while in 2023, just fewer than 12 per cent did so. Fewer than one in 10 young adults in the UK smoked cigarettes in 2023 - down from a quarter of 18-24-year-olds 12 years earlier.
Overall, there has been a shift of mindset among people and the change can be seen at convenience stores too.
And this brings us to a fundamental question: with smoking rates already on a steady decline, is such a complex ban even required?
Singh feels such a ban is “not practical or real, not even required.” as people themselves are getting more health conscious and smoking rate is reducing massively.
“People are already making better choices but to suppress their freedom is not the right answer here,” he said, adding that rising the age from 18 to 21 would have made more sense.
Singh’s message to the government is blunt but poignant: “Put resources into education. Bringing awareness in the masses will and is showing better results as smokers are reducing.”
Retailer Trudy Davies
Retailers across the UK are speaking with one voice. They want the government to understand the practical realities and to respect the efforts they already make to promote responsible retail.
As Davies succinctly puts it, “Government needs to stop thinking only on the lines of ‘Ban, Ban, Ban’. Please, go to your local shop and stand in our staff's shoes for a few hours.
"Those people on the shop floor who have to handle your new legislation on a daily basis should be included in any discussions before laws are made.”
Clearly, if Labour’s goal is truly to create a healthier UK, then it needs to listen, understand and collaborate with convenience sector; maybe even refine and realistically re-imagine the otherwise seemingly lopsided bill to make it more practical and impactful?